Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tls-padding-03: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-padding/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Like Ben: -- 5, last sentence: Do you expect anyone to implement this MAY? It seems like this either needs to be stronger, or removed as a "why bother"? In my spec, I usually write this way: Servers SHOULD verify that the extension is either empty or contains only zero bytes and log the exceptions. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
