Martin Thomson <martin.thom...@gmail.com> writes: >An endpoint that receives an illegal combination of "things" MAY choose to >treat that as a fatal error.
Does that actually help? What it's saying in full is: An endpoint that receives an illegal combination of "things" MAY choose to treat that as a fatal error or MAY choose not to treat it as a fatal error. which is a no-op. Admittedly it explicitly allows you to treat it as an error while previously the response was left open, but it's still not terribly useful, anyone writing a client that submits gibberish things can claim it's OK and the server needs to be fixed to accept it. Peter. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
