On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:35:30AM -0700, Martin Thomson wrote:
> 
> As for the wasted bytes, I don't care for that.  We will fix that later.

It is not just wasted bytes.

It is also increased auditing requirements: Auditing that the nonce 
generation is sound (e.g. not random).

And in constructs like this, if you get it wrong, you will notice very
quickly (contrast to AES-GCM nonce generation: Serious errors can remain
hidden).

Also, unifying the GCM scheme, CCM scheme the scheme from this draft
and TLS 1.3 scheme isn't hard (supporting CBC is loads more annoying,
as it is much harder to unify[1]).


[1] Well, there are tricks with TLS 1.1/1.2 CBC modes, but TLS 1.0
CBC modes just won't unify.


-Ilari

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to