On Thu 2015-07-09 15:43:16 +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> This draft uses the rfc6091 cert_type extension. If that is not
> intentional, rfc6091 was made obsolete by rfc7250 which uses the
> server_certificate_type and client_certificate_type extensions (even
> though the text doesn't mention that).
There is no explicit "obsoletes:" header in 7250. Should we post an
erratum to either 7250 or 6091 or both to provide clearer guidance for
future authors?
--dkg
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
