Agreed. I wouldn't enforce any more minimum than now. Warning makes sense. But, I can't anticipate someone doesn't have a use case where they want to use a smaller terminal.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 7:16 PM Thomas Beierlein <dl1...@darc.de> wrote: > > Am Sat, 23 Nov 2019 18:30:01 -0600 > schrieb Nate Bargmann <n...@n0nb.us>: > > > * On 2019 23 Nov 08:14 -0600, Drew Arnett wrote: > > > Resize is fine, but please continue to support 80x25 long term. I > > > don't see classic TUI losing value anytime soon. > > > > Do you mean that Tlf should enforce a minimum 80x25 terminal size as > > it has in the past? Personally, I've no problem with that. > > 'Enforcing' is a little bit difficult as (as far as I know) we can not > force a minimum size on any xwindow. But I will leave the warning in > place that you should have at least 25 lines in your terminal. > > > > > What about a 2nd application, tlf-config or easy-tlf-config, which > > > would have the pulldown menus etc for setting up config files. Keep > > > the pulldown menus out of tlf. Once you add menus, you'll add a > > > bunch of hotkeys. One of the nice things about TLF is that there > > > aren't a bunch of live keys, especially if run out of a console or > > > terminal rather than a windows manager. > > > > That's actually a very good idea, Drew. If such a program were to > > gain good enough coverage then the :SET and :CFG commands could just > > call it instead of an editor. As for hot keys, Tlf does have quite a > > few assigned already. > > > Ok, I really like these idea. I will add it as an alternative to > the ToDo entry for the configuration menu. > > 73, de Tom > > > > -- > "Do what is needful!" > Ursula LeGuin: Earthsea > -- >
