hi all, On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 08:14:19AM -0600, Doug Smith W9WI wrote: > - http://www.frontiernet.net/~aflowers/k3rtty/k3rtty.html suggests > it is very possible to have an AFSK-generated RTTY signal that's > *cleaner* than a FSK signal. You do of course have to pay attention > & make sure you have a clean connection to your radio -- and have > any OS-generated sounds turned off!
thanks for the link, that's more interesting! :) (Thomas: sorry for the off-topic thread!) > - Several users of N1MM Logger have requested a macro to send back > the received exchange. The developers refuse to do so, stating that > it's not good practice. To be honest I agree -- it slows down the > exchange and, if the numbers are similar, can result in confusion. > > It's probably not a bad idea to have this function available but I > would be careful about using it. yes, that's the point: if anybody doesn't/can't use that, just simply ignore that macro - that doesn't _need_ to use, that's only an option. 73, Ervin HA2OS _______________________________________________ Tlf-devel mailing list Tlf-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tlf-devel
