* On 2013 31 Dec 06:07 -0600, Thomas Beierlein wrote: > The single rig backends are normally implemented by different OMs. So > we have a situation where different rigs show different behaviour quite > often.
One of the things I would like to see addressed in Hamlib is this difference between backends. In some ways it is not easy or may not be possible due to differences between the radios themselves. The backends have been added in an ad hoc manner and have not been guided by a single "best of" approach or policy. This adversely affects TLF et. al. and is supposed to be one of the benefits of Hamlib for applications. Part of my ongoing work is to improve the Hamlib documentation as a needed first step. Reading this list helps me to better understand those issues which I hope to address in the documentation. I know several on this list have contributed to Hamlib and for that you have my thanks. Don't be afraid to suggest changes and fixes. Happy New Year! 73, de Nate >> -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://www.n0nb.us _______________________________________________ Tlf-devel mailing list Tlf-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tlf-devel
