Hi Tom,

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Thomas Beierlein <t...@forth-ev.de> wrote:

>
> I will look into it. But it will be a busy week here and it is possible
> that I will find time only the next weekend.
>

No worries, Tom. It was mainly a 'heads-up' in case you had an 'ah I know
what that is' moment. I've not had time to take a second look myself.

In meantime can you please start cwdaemon with a '-n' switch added.
> Then it will not go to daemon and output debug messages what it is
> doing.
>
> Try the PTT (for the new and old version) and send us the results. That
> would be helpful.
>

Yeah, I already did that. cwdaemon just reports 'PTT on' or PTT off'.
There's no output of the string actually received. With the new version of
netkeyer.c you get two successive 'PTT on' reports, but with the old version
you get 'PTT on' followed by 'PTT off', as expected.

To aid debug, also had a second terminal open, running 'nc -u localhost
6789'. It is able to key PTT on or off with '<ESC>a1' or '<ESC>a0', as
expected. When the bug in TLF leaves PTT on, I am able to get it back to PTT
off by sending the second command.

Btw, which version of cwdaemon do you use?
>

I'm not at home right now, but I believe it's version 0.9. I have no reason
to believe it's a cwdaemon issue though.

My C is a bit rusty, but I'll take a second look. I didn't really see any
significant changes when I looked the first time. I see that the buf char
array is now initialised - I guess this was one of those compiler warnings
you've fixed? Otherwise, the changes look fairly cosmetic. My guess is that
it'll be something like the string terminator being lost, but I'll look more
closely when I have some time.

73 Andy, G4KNO.
_______________________________________________
Tlf-devel mailing list
Tlf-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tlf-devel

Reply via email to