Hi, sure, you are right.
When testing the code I mentioned in my previous emails, we (of course) tested the measurements and compared it with the logs from Cooja. The key advantage of the software based solution is the following: You can deploy it together with your code in the big testbeds (Twist etc) and get results without the need for deploying extra hardware. Best regards, Olaf On 17 Jan 2014, at 9:05 , Christian Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/17/2014 07:03 AM, Eric Decker wrote: >> The second part of my response talks about s/w solutions but it requires a >> really good time base driving the timer that you are using for the >> measurements. >> > > Why not just use a simulator/emulator that can give you the energy > consumption , e.g. AVRORA ? I wouldn't trust any sw measurement as long > as i haven't verified it with a real world measurement. > > Good Luck, > Christian > _______________________________________________ > Tinyos-help mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list [email protected] https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
