On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Antonio Linan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Your lack of google-fu is dissapointing :) > oh nonsense... :-) I pointed Bipin at the last site you mention at least a week ago. He keeps asking why it doesn't work. I've been saying one needs to understand what the protocols look like and then one needs to tweak the stack so the packets look right. > > > https://sites.google.com/site/compsciencemech/projects/tinyos-xbee-compliant-radio-stack > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOfrPTZdosQ > > I've made a Z1 talk to a XBee a long time ago for a mindless experiment, > you need to adapt the AM message format to get raw frames > Ah, no that isn't correct. One of the things that needs to happen to get a mote to talk to a XBee node is the removal of the am_type field which it doesn't understand. As soon as you do that the packet isn't AM and the stack isn't AM. > through the CC2420, I just emulated the expected responses from the Xbee > module, without implementing the full stack. > How did you deal with the fixed pre-assigned 16 bit addresses that the TinyOS side uses? > > > http://embedntks.com/tinyos-xbee-interoperability-xbee-compatible-cc2420-radio-stack/ > > Cheers, > > --Antonio > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Eric Decker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Zigbee sits on top of the 802.15.4 layer. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Bipin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hello friend, >>> >>> That >> >> >> What "that" are you referring to? >> >> Stop using adjectives and start talking explicits. >> >> The devil is in the details. >> >> >>> doesn't make any sense. may be its not completed... i >>> dont know .... >> >> >> >> >>> Using the IEEE 802.15.4 Stack we can make an inter >>> operable connection to any other device..... >> >> >> I thought you were talking about TinyOS talking to Zigbee. So why are >> you >> now talking about Zigbee to Zigbee? >> >> If you want to confuse the issue, fine, but don't expect to make much >> progress. >> >> >>> because all the Zig-Bee >>> technology uses the same IEEE 802.15.4 Stack.... >> >> >> TinyOS is not Zigbee. There are various assumptions in the TinyOS stack >> that makes it operate as a subset of the full 802.15.4 standard. >> >> And the Zigbee stack sits on top of 802.15.4. >> >> >> >>> If any one have a >>> proper direction of making this communication.. Please help me to >>> solve this........ >>> >> >> I don't know what you expect at this point. We've pointed you at various >> things where other folks have looked into TinyOS communicating with Zigbee >> nodes and you keep coming back. >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://tinyos-help.10906.n7.nabble.com/Interoperability-in-ZigBee-tp23899p23904.html >>> Sent from the TinyOS - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tinyos-help mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Eric B. Decker >> Senior (over 50 :-) Researcher >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tinyos-help mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help >> > > > > -- > -- > Antonio Liñán Colina > R+D Engineer > @: [email protected] > @: [email protected] > ------------------------------ > Advancare > Ph.: +34 935 511 403 > http://www.advancare.com > http://www.zolertia.com > http://zolertia.sourceforge.net > http://webshop.zolertia.com > -- Eric B. Decker Senior (over 50 :-) Researcher
_______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list [email protected] https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
