Dear When I tested, I changed the compression parameter from the default (0) to the best (11). This affected the throughput (improved about 20%), however, it is still slower than OpenVPN.
Just FYI, PING response is better for tinc, but the iperf throughput is better for OpenVPN. Regards --- "Christian Lyra" <l...@pop-pr.rnp.br> --- >Hi, > > >> > I have tried to use tinc on WindowsXP and measured throughput in >> > contrast to OpenVPN. > >Openvpn uses lzo compression by default, I´m not sure if tinc does. I >would look for the compression parameters on both to be sure you are >comparing the same thing. Even ping responses times will be different >with/without compression. > > >> > >> > My test revealed that tinc is faster in PING response (almost half >> > of OpenVPN). However, when I tested with iperf, tinc's throughput >> > is about half of OpenVPN. >> > > >-- >Christian Lyra >POP-PR - RNP > >http://lyra.soueu.com.br > >No matter how many shorts we have in the system, my guards will be >instructed to treat every surveillance camera malfunction as a full- >scale emergency. > The Top Things I'd Do > If I Ever Became an Evil Overlord >_______________________________________________ >tinc mailing list >tinc@tinc-vpn.org >http://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc Masateru KUWATA Computer & Communications Consulting Phone: 070-5465-6505(Domestic)/+81-70-5465-6505(Oversea） Mobile mail:masateru_kuw...@wm.pdx.ne.jp Profile: http://www.geocities.jp/mki_ltd/page002.html BLOG : http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/mki_ltd/MYBLOG/ _______________________________________________ tinc mailing list tinc@tinc-vpn.org http://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc
