I would like to see some kind of community 'store' where community member can state that they consider themselves a community member! - A place where people can say how they contribute, their tw interests , and advertise their plugins - not every plugin can be in the offical plugins, eg my visualeditor plugin uses ckeditor those license is incompatible with tiddlywiki's, yet it is the most popular in-page editor of the Internet. Other plugins may enable inline javascript etc.
Cheers BJ On Friday, July 17, 2015 at 12:22:10 PM UTC+1, Mat wrote: > > Hi again Jeremy and thank you for your replies! > > Ok, so tw.com to curate/store only selected resources, including selected > editions and, as far as non-selected resources go, tw.com will display > links to those. > > As a simple end user, the curating (quality assurance) obviously is a very > important aspect but the actual storage *location *is probably less > important so a "link store" (instead of an "app store") should be great. > > But I really hope we can find a way to *c*apture the fuller wealth of > community output - in addition to the carefully pull-requested and > pre-moderated gems. For instance via; > > > - a webcrawler > - something like Erwans community aggregator > <https://rawgit.com/erwanm/tw-aggregator/master/tw-community-search.html> > - a meta-data list generated from tiddlyspot > > > This could be displayed in a separate TW (like Erwans creation already > does) but included on tw.com in a iframe(!) to be displayed in a *prominent > but distinct *section. The iframe sandboxes it and makes it very > managable as an entity. And the individual entries in that iframed tw could > be manipulated using the usual tw tools to slice and dice. > > Would you welcome something like this? Visitors to tw.com would - and are > now!!! - otherwise simply *missing out on 99% of what tiddlywiki > encompasses*. What can we otherwise do to capture the material that is > out there but that is simply not pull requested to you? > > I'm *certain* there are incredible TW creations out there built by people > with the intention to solve a need they have... and that is all they care > about *and they couldn't care less if the rest of us know about it*. All > fair, but very unfortunate for us. > > I believe one key factor for youtubes success is the *post*-moderation, > rather than pre-moderation, i.e viewers can report inappropriate material > instead of an obviously impossible task to pre-moderate it. (I'm guessing > the post-moderation is even automated on the host side to remove a clip > after X complaints.) Youtube is of course another league, but it is enough > to look at Erwans community aggregator, a service that has been around for > less than a year and that hosts stuff from merely 17 authors but has 4370 > tiddlers... it is clearly unthinkable that someone should pre-moderate > this. They're not all relevant tiddlers, and they are tiddlers not > *tiddlywikis*, but okay if we look at *tiddlyspot* I'm certain the number > of spots is also a totally unmanagable number to pre-moderate. Not that > anyone would pull request them. > > Besides, the focus on tiddlywikis as opposed to tiddlers is partly because > we cannot easily handle single tiddlers. Erwans solution is interesting > also from that respect. A direct consequence from pre-moderation is that > the reporting of a tw is compromised into an often unspecific summary like > "a collection of...". This simplification is 100% understandable, also > considering that the content of those sites change, but nonetheless it > means the visitor to tw.com simply doesn't really get to know what the > reported site offers. > > > I'd love to hear your thoughts on this super important matter. > > > Thank you Jeremy! > > <:-) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d052e4fe-43f0-49f4-88af-1c3f7f78a250%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
