I did create an GH issue:
https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/8153
On Wednesday, April 17, 2024 at 8:33:00 AM UTC+2 PMario wrote:
> I'm not 100% sure yet, but there seems to be a bug. I'll have a closer
> look.
> A fast look to the code suggests, that the documentation is right.
> But I can confirm, that *it does not work* as intended with my test
> tiddlers.
> -m
>
> On Wednesday, April 17, 2024 at 1:39:12 AM UTC+2 springer wrote:
>
>> Interesting! The documentation DOES imply that you can tuck :reverse into
>> the very place where you had it!
>>
>> Perhaps this is just an error in documentation? In fact it works fine if
>> it comes *before* the sort-type parameter:
>>
>> `{{{ [has[version]] :sort:reverse:version[get[version]] }}}`
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7:31:00 PM UTC-4 Cade Roux wrote:
>>
>>> I see, I can use that separate reverse operator instead of doing it in
>>> the initial sort.
>>>
>>> I'm still not sure how to use the reverse documented here in the
>>> flaglist in the :sort filter run prefix:
>>>
>>> https://tiddlywiki.com/#Sort%20Filter%20Run%20Prefix
>>>
>>> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 182937.png]
>>>
>>> I'll post any future questions in the other forums.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Cade
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 6:01:18 PM UTC-5 springer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Of course, I meant "come on over *from* google groups, and join us at
>>>> talk.tiddlywiki.org"
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 6:59:58 PM UTC-4 springer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Cade! As you might note with other posts at google groups, the
>>>>> community for this discussion has migrated to talk.tiddlywiki.org.
>>>>>
>>>>> Although we (at that forum) can still *see* posts from the google
>>>>> group, we can't reply easily to them.
>>>>>
>>>>> So please come on over to google groups.
>>>>>
>>>>> Meanwhile, I can suggest that the documentation on the reverse
>>>>> Operator <https://tiddlywiki.com/#reverse%20Operator%20(Examples)> shows
>>>>> that it doesn't take a parameter, nor does it work as a parameter within
>>>>> the sort filter run prefix; instead it works at the "caboose" end of any
>>>>> filter to flip the list order. Something like this works at
>>>>> Tiddlywiki.com:
>>>>>
>>>>> `{{{ [has[version]] :sort:version[get[version]] +[reverse[]] }}}`
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 12:29:33 PM UTC-4 Cade Roux wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I have change logs with a field for version information, and I am
>>>>>> trying to sort them in reverse order and it doesn't appear to be
>>>>>> working.
>>>>>> The change log tiddlers themselves are also lists, but I cleared all
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> out and loaded these into the latest TW version to make a minimal
>>>>>> reproducible case. If I take out the sort entirely, the 10.0 comes to
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> top as you would expect for them to be sorted by title. But the sort
>>>>>> either with or without :reverse is the same.
>>>>>> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 112417.png]
>>>>>> <ul><$list filter="[ascend.change[index]]
>>>>>> :sort:version:reverse[get[ascend.version]]"><li><$link to={{!!title}}
>>>>>> /><br/><$transclude/></li></$list></ul>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 112528.png]
>>>>>> What am I doing wrong?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/efc4cd64-a2d8-4cac-9788-3c1fcca51f9cn%40googlegroups.com.
