@ TiddlyTweeter The thoughts in this thread are a good review of some basic concepts would likely be helpful to newCoimers as well as veterans. Hence I think there (/should be) interest in accepting your offer to add some links.
Cheers, Hans On Saturday, October 16, 2021 at 6:26:11 AM UTC-4 TiddlyTweeter wrote: > Mat wrote (slightly edit by me): > >> ... you ... *reuse the content in different narratives*. But if you >> don't reuse the content in other narratives, then there is no real need for >> ... fine grained partition of the content. > > > >> ...but you say this is for your Zettelkasten ... I.e if your purpose is >> "zettelkasten" then wouldn't that steer how long the content of your >> tiddlers would be? >> > > Right. Traditional Zettelkasten entries never change their titles. And > they tend towards a strict, delimited, unchanging, scope. FWIW, in various > experiments in TW with Zettlekasten, there has been *translusion* used to > cope, particularly, with "inter-referring" between them. A modest > extension from the basic idea of their "invariability". Bimlas has written > and worked extensively about this. I'll look for his links if there is > interest. > > Side comment, TT > > On Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 6:52:53 PM UTC+2 [email protected] >> wrote: >> >>> I use my Tiddlywiki as a Zettelkaten (work in process!) and some of my >>> Tiddlers are quite long. I title the Tiddler with a unique piece of >>> information, in my own words, and then I include a description and >>> resources. Some of my Tiddlers get very long...maybe too long. Is there a >>> best practice for Tiddler length and what to include in the Tiddler? >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/297e3f63-9c53-4fe5-84e8-adfb103c5501n%40googlegroups.com.
