This is for both PMario & Mohammad ... PMario wrote:
> There is an API, to manage and manipulate bookmars with web-extensions. > So it should be possible to "manipulate" them from TW directly. ... But > this would be a completely new AddON. > Ha! Interesting. What is the advantage of that API over *BRUTE PARSING? * I looked at the output from Chrome & Firefox. The "href" bits look simple to capture. BUT the format also includes icon data sometimes. That is more API territory than simple brute parsing a link? My question: WHO needs the icon bits & WHY? in TW? For purpose I'd like to know WHAT (attribute="value") end-users need preserving from browser bookmarks??? Just a question TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/85b9a103-0bc2-4827-bf29-320e8e7b35c1n%40googlegroups.com.
