Mohammad wrote: > one ... BIG reason is many just use it and do not care to support it! >
Right! That is a *common* issue for open-source tools. TiddlyWiki is very unusual, I think, in having an exceptional, friendly, dedicated following of "user-hackers" (i.e. NOT developers in the narrow sense; it really embraces amateur page-makers) that help develop it. You ever noticed that there are virtually no NAIVE final-end users of TW completed apps on the GG or GitHub? The point, in a way, is to CREATE an end-web-page (by user-hacker) and move on. The downside is that at the point of publishing the *origin of the page from TW will DISAPPEAR.* At the MOMENT there is simply NO way, no Google search, that can identify all the TiddlyWikis in the "wild." It is likely huge. We just don't know. It is making knowing how widely it is REALLY used very difficult. That is partly by design as TW core eschews any hard-coded traceability at the moment. *Just some comments!* TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/babbd0d4-51c5-4926-a441-25170a9334a7n%40googlegroups.com.
