Stobot wrote: > ... while there's a indexes[] filter operator, there's not a corresponding > values[] one... I can iterate through the 100,000 customers and manually > look for the ones with say an "active" value, but I can't just return a > list of customers with the "active" value in the filter. >
Great observation! IMO being able to easily filter VALUES as well as INDICES would open a big, big door. IMO data dictionaries (binary animals) are really excellent for a LOT of ordinary data presentation issues which are very often ONLY needing an index/value. TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/21db0810-ba18-49c4-948f-98a4ce155f1en%40googlegroups.com.
