Mat wrote: > Cool. > > Maybe we could emulate that "inline CSS" function so one could pass a > tiddler through it. Or an export tiddler function where it was built in. > That's actually a really interesting idea because it might be a way to rid > the whole stylesheets load that follows when you export even a single > tiddler. Hm... that might actully be exactly what is needed; a tool that > replaces all class="foo" with style="whatever foo defines". This makes > perfect sense for exported tiddlers. >
Right. One of the reasons I like "Markdown Here" is simply I input the raw HTML and much of the time the recipient system has perfectly okay CSS for rendering standard raw output. BUT IF you need add a bit of precision CSS (class) you can add it. I think you are right that "inline CSS" is a good general approach to portability, though I am not so clear how to easily do that in TW for such purposes. TT, x -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/4a5a5795-588a-4597-a46b-31d5adb73ccfn%40googlegroups.com.
