Jeremy,

In other words, I think TiddlyWiki 5 is ripe for such a thorough internal 
> overhaul that changing the names might not be as much of a practical 
> consideration as it would be if we had to maintain backwards compatibility.
>

I think this makes perfect sense. At first I was thinking we just meant 
smaller changes when discussing breaking some backward compatibility in 
5.2.x or 6.x, where a few select things might break or be different. 

However, if we truly want to use this as an opportunity to modernize and 
also revise some architectural decisions (like field definitions!), then 
indeed renaming "tiddler" becomes much easier to accomplish at the same 
time. I do think we need to start planning such a move as some of that 
early baggage is indeed weighing down further development.

Such pervasive changes also suggests the need for a clearer demarcation 
from TW5 than calling it TW5.2 or TW6 would provide. TiddlyWiki 6, in my 
opinion, would suggest it just a newer version of TiddlyWiki 5 that one can 
just upgrade to. So a product name change could easily be accomplished at 
the same time.

One other consideration, though this should not be a decisive one, is that 
recently we have been very fortunate to have a lot of momentum in terms of 
developers contributing to the core. It would be good if at all possible, 
to leverage that momentum towards this end, rather than let it be something 
that might kill that momentum. On the other hand, architectural changes and 
refactoring is often best accomplished by a single focused mind, at least 
at first. So there may not be much that can be done about it. Just knowing 
that there is a breaking version in the works will naturally subdue the 
enthusiasm to keep working on the current core, unless there is some 
assurance the work can be re-used, which might be tricky. A tentative 
timeline for the new version may also help.

These are just some of the practical considerations that come to mind, 
which I guess is my way of expressing my support for the idea of both a 
breaking change to refresh the core, as well as a rename to differentiate 
from TiddlyWiki 5.

Regards,
Saq



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/8d8ea8b7-f2e7-48ea-9935-611c8c57adben%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to