There are a few angles to this topic.

If the aim is to improve the authoring experience you may be interested in 
my ongoing EditorMagic project. I think the concept of a balloon popup 
<https://ckeditor.com/docs/ckeditor5/latest/examples/builds/balloon-editor.html>
 
editor inspired it. I elaborate on the concept here: Trigger Custom Popus 
via Custom Strings <https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/3784>. 
While this is not quite the same thing as directly editing the wysiwyg 
text, it would make for a *much *more efficient editing experience. 
Possibly, it may also be adapted so that it *is* possible to use it in 
tiddler view mode: If all elements were "targettable" from view mode, 
perhaps if they had a div automatically added to them, then maybe this 
would be possible.

>From some fiddling with WordPress years ago I recall -- possibly only in 
some themes -- a system with *three *"views": One showing the finished 
static look (what we call "view mode"), one showing the underlying code 
(perhaps what is the html code) and one "in between layer" that was a kind 
of a...hmm... "mixed view", for example a table that in the finished look 
would have no visible borders did have borders here for easy selection (e.g 
to set visibility),  bold text really was bold (like in finished look), 
hovering an image showed it's resize-handles etc. A 
high-but-still-modifiable UI level.

I can see several improvements along the way. For example, for defining a 
macro we "shouldn't" have to type "\define ... \end". It "should" be one 
tiddler per macro. Setting the tiddler "sort" (type?) as macro 
automatically adds the $:/tags/Macro (ideally hidden) and the title of the 
tiddler is the macro title. There's also automatically a field for the 
parameter list. 

In fact, I think we are sometimes too exposed to Tiddler Philosophy. This 
stands in the way when composing larger texts. I would like for "compound 
tiddlers" where editing a tiddler really enables access to multiple 
tiddlers. I made this long ago but, like much else, I don't think I ever 
published it:

http://supertiddlers.tiddlyspot.com/#About%20SuperTiddlers

That site actually has several features but for our discussion, only the 
"SuperTiddlers" concept is relevant. Be sure to read the About tab and try 
out the Demos - especially the over-the-top Styles demo - and hover over 
the text(s) in it. As I outline in the About tab, the point is that 
tiddlers miss context for longer narratives but with a UI change we could 
easily solve this. Note that tiddlers do *not *need to use multiple 
sections like that and everything is still just tiddlers. 

The relevance to Edgaras OP here is that a "SuperTiddler" let's you edit a 
small portion at a time of what is seen.

<:-)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d183bbbf-9985-49a1-9152-edc274fd93b2%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to