> In my point of view, these conversion options to different languages
can be removed, or, as an alternative, can be summarized as "export to
code file".
I agree with you. Feel free to submit a pull request.
On 2020/3/28 ????11:17, Yue, Xiang wrote:
Hi??
I'm an applicant of GSoC 2020 and I was trying some import/export
options. (just some ready-ups for improvement). The options read that
I can convert my TeXmacs doc to programming language source code, like
C++, Scala or something. But I don't know what the differences between
these.
However I tried to export .cpp, .py and .java file. The only
difference that I found is about their file suffixes, and everything
in export content is the same.
Actually I don't know what's the relationship between TeXmacs and
programming languages. I think the truth is that TeXmacs regards the
conversion as "convert to plain text".
In my point of view, these conversion options to different languages
can be removed, or, as an alternative, can be summarized as "export to
code file".
Best regards,
Xiang
_______________________________________________
Texmacs-dev mailing list
Texmacs-dev@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
_______________________________________________
Texmacs-dev mailing list
Texmacs-dev@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
