Hi Bob, On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 02:20:04PM -0400, Bob Tennent wrote: > > What is the appropriate prefix for a package that depends on tex[live] > packages but is *not* included in TeXLive itself? Should it be > texlive-package or just tex-package, or just package?
You are right that there isn't any policy anywhere how to do it. I personally prefer tex-package. > BTW, I note that > the Fedora Package Naming Guidelines say that TeX packages should *not* > be named after the TeX "environment" (TeX Live or teTeX) but instead > should carry the prefix "tex-". Right. > So all the texlive packages in the > TeXlive for Fedora repo are inappropriately named. Just thought you > might like to know :+) Good point. Maybe I could at least rename the CTAN packages to have tex-* prefix. Thanks, Jindrich > > Bob T. > _______________________________________________ > TeXLive mailing list > TeXLive@linux.cz > http://www.linux.cz/mailman/listinfo/texlive -- Jindrich Novy <jn...@redhat.com> http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je, kdo ženu má a nelíbá, kdo zábavě se vyhýbá, na toho vemte bič a hůl, to není člověk, to je vůl. --- Jan Werich _______________________________________________ TeXLive mailing list TeXLive@linux.cz http://www.linux.cz/mailman/listinfo/texlive
