On 09/24/2011 08:21 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Approximately five of packages that I'm also in charge of are listed, > but none of the entries is right. Some hyph* packages miss the point > and context-vim was updated on request of RedHat at least a year ago.
I did point out that the page was not up to date. :) > If you update the list, fell free to ask me (off-list) for details, > but I'm probably not the only one that would see wrong entries on the > list. > > It might make more sense to contact TL team directly than to draw your > own conclusions in case of unclarities. They often remove packages > with unsuitable licences on try to reach authors to fix problems on > CTAN, but it is true that some problems might go unnoticed since > nobody checks every single file in distribution. There are thousands > of them. It is not correct to say "nobody checks", since we're doing it. And we have contacted the TL team, and we get... mixed results from that. But, as I keep saying, we need to make a new list of components, licenses, and status, and work from there. ~tom == Fedora Project _______________________________________________ TeXLive mailing list TeXLive@linux.cz http://www.linux.cz/mailman/listinfo/texlive
