This went through fine for me with a couple of additional repos, until
the end when after download size it wrote "operation aborted" which is
maybe what you expect for "--assumeno" but possibly represents an issue?
On 21/02/2024 08:14, Luna Jernberg wrote:
Other then some missing RPMFusion packages
Den ons 21 feb. 2024 kl 09:13 skrev Luna Jernberg <droidbit...@gmail.com>:
Worked good on my Thinkpad Edge laptop some weeks ago
Den ons 21 feb. 2024 kl 08:12 skrev Miroslav Suchý <msu...@redhat.com>:
Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
# This is last time we should do that :)
sudo dnf module reset '*'
dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
--assumeno distro-sync
This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal
potential problems.
You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command.
The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the actual
upgrade.
In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate
package.
Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora
40. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages first:
https://red.ht/2kuBDPu
and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F40FailsToInstall)
reports:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2231790&bug_id_type=anddependson&format=tvp&list_id=13416789
Two notes:
* you may want to run the same command with dnf5 to help test new dnf. Do not
forget to add --best otherwise DNF5 hides all problems.
* this command found several issues on my workstation. One was issue with teamd
that you will likely hit too:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263334
and there was few other with missing provides/obsoletes that I reported. For
convenience here is the relevant part of Fedora Guidelines:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages
Thank you
Miroslav
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
Bill Murray
STFC-RAL / Warwick University
Sent from my laptop
Skype william.john.murray Tel +44 7826 486185
--
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
