I could probably live with both versions, the Ben's one working a little more straightforward to me.
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 1:59 PM Ben Cotton <bcot...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 5:48 AM Kamil Paral <kpa...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > The desktop environment must work correctly when displaying common > application content - that includes regular application windows, video > output, games and possibly other common content. Regular operations like > windows close/resize/maximize/minimize/fullscreen (when > supported/applicable), windows switching, using windows on virtual > workspaces, and similar common operations must behave as expected. > > Thinking like an editor for a moment, this feels a little redundant in > places. I agree with the general concept, so this is entirely a > presentation issue and I will not push back if you disagree. :But how > about something more like: > > The desktop environment must perform regular operations like windows > close/resize/maximize/minimize/fullscreen (when supported/applicable), > windows switching, using windows on virtual workspaces, and similar > common operations as expected. Common application content such as > regular application windows, video output, and games must be displayed > correctly. > > > Footnote - "What does this cover?": > > A small number of misbehaving applications is not a violation of this > criterion. The goal of this criterion is to ensure general functionality > for different types of applications and their operations. An example of a > violation would be e.g. if a significant number of QT applications couldn't > be resized (but they should be), or if all Java applications failed to > display any content. > > I'd also add something that makes it clear if it's the application not > displaying the content correctly, that's out of scope for this > criterion. I can't think of a good way to phrase that. But I wouldn't > want someone to think Joe's Fancy Pew Pew Pew Game having a glitchy > display would violate this. > > > I think this criterion could target F38 Beta Release Criteria [3] or > Basic Release Criteria [4]. > > Definitely Basic for the same reason as Neal gave. > > -- > Ben Cotton > He / Him / His > Fedora Program Manager > Red Hat > TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis > _______________________________________________ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- Lukáš Růžička FEDORA QE, RHCE Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com> Purkyňova 115 612 45 Brno - Královo Pole lruzi...@redhat.com TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
