Am 05.03.23 um 08:41 schrieb Felix Miata:
Is anyone using rpm besides dnf and me? It has gotten very noisy:
# rpm -qa | grep intel
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 2
Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 81b46521: BAD
Header SHA1 digest: OK
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 13
Header V4 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 8898875c: BAD
Header SHA1 digest: OK
...
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 75
Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 2ab131c6: BAD
Header SHA256 digest: OK
Header SHA1 digest: OK
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 76
Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 2ab131c6: BAD
Header SHA256 digest: OK
Header SHA1 digest: OK
xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.99.917-55.20210115.fc38.x86_64
intel-gpu-firmware-20230210-147.fc38.noarch
#
Bug searches for rpmdbNextIterator came up empty.
You just hit what I had complained about in
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/4YXK7GEY4SSXCMMCCC7IBTBSIZLGOG3C/#4YXK7GEY4SSXCMMCCC7IBTBSIZLGOG3C
rpm in f38 is not noisy, it is broken and can't "gracefully" handle
package signatures.
There had been some useful links to work arounds in followups to this
discussion, but they now seem to broken in the list's archive, as well ;)
Ralf
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
