On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:18 AM AV via test <test@lists.fedoraproject.org>
wrote:

> On Sat, 2022-11-19 at 19:33 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 11/18/22 16:11, AV via test wrote:
> > > Following info on https://getfedora.org/en/security/
> > >
> > > gpgv --keyring ./fedora.gpg *-CHECKSUM
> > > gpgv: not a detached signature
> > >
> > > I think a little correction is warranted.
> >
> > You need to give more specific information about what exactly you
> > tried.
> > I followed the instructions there and it worked as expected.
>
> I discovered today what happened. I had downloaded both
> Fedora-Workstation and Fedora-Everything together with
> their CHECKSUMS into the same folder.
> If you then try "gpgv --keyring ./fedora.gpg *-CHECKSUM"
> it results in this error message.
> Remove one of the two from the folder and it works as
> expected.
> But as yet it is not clear to me why this error message
> meant for another situation.
>

Can you file a bug or a pull request at
https://pagure.io/fedora-web/websites/ ? I think the command should be
modified to:
$ gpgv --keyring ./fedora.gpg CHECKSUM_FILE
and the description should state to replace CHECKSUM_FILE with an actual
checksum file name. I agree that currently it's confusing because it looks
like it can handle processing multiple checksum files together (which is
the case for sha256sum, but not for gpgv).
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to