Fedora 33 brough systemd-resolved by default; but in Fedora 35 this
somehow got reverted.

I've proposed it as a blocker, but the main point of the thread is
really to discuss the general case of whether such a thing is a
blocker? I'm not thinking of a release criterion that applies to this
case. It seems reasonable that approved+implemented features that
subsequently break (accidentally or even intentionally when absent an
approved change) should be blockers.

Server edition is missing /etc/resolv.conf symlink (use systemd-resolved)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032085



-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to