On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 10:55:28 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > On 10/28/20 10:16, Ankur Sinha wrote: > <snip> > > > > I think sha256sum is pointing out the 19 lines related to the PGP > > Signature in the CHECKSUM file, which it can't understand. > > > > https://getfedora.org/static/checksums/Fedora-Workstation-33-1.2-x86_64-CHECKSUM > > > > Perhaps the CHECKSUM files were not previously signed. > > > > > > Thanks for your reply. The checksum file you sent gives the same OK and > Warning results as above;
Yes, it also includes the 19 lines for the PGP signature, which sha256sum doesn't understand. So, this is expected. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
