On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 13:57 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > > It's not about interpretation or not, it's just about a preference for > > this: > > > > Test Steps > > ---------- > > > > 1. Step 1 > > 2. Step 2 > > 3. Step 3 > > > > Expected Results > > ---------------- > > > > 1. Expected result 1 > > 2. Expected result 2 > > 3. Expected result 3 > > > > versus this: > > > > Test Steps and Expected Results > > ------------------------------- > > > > 1. Step 1 > > 2. Expected result 1 > > 3. Step 2 > > 4. Expected result 2 > > 5. Step 3 > > 6. Expected result 3 > > > > Our current template really only handles the first style, if you want > > to do the second style you have to do some kind of 'hack' like kparal > > did. I'm just saying if the second style is clearly better for some > > test, we should probably add an alternative template or tweak the > > existing template to have a 'mode' which works better for that style. > > > > Sorry for the misunderstanding. I think the second format would serve us > best. > > 1. Step 1 > 2. Expected result 1 > 3. Step 2 > 4. Expected result 2 > > This makes the test case easier to read with lower chance of confusion.
I think there are cases where each works better, there's no harm in supporting both. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
