On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 2:47 AM Kamil Paral <kpa...@redhat.com> wrote:
>I find it a very poor experience to wait 90+ seconds for machine >reboot/shutdown. Much poorer than, say, a crashing desktop application (which >we block on), because that application can be replaced with a different one. >System services mostly can't be replaced, and certainly not by a general user. I agree. I always force power off in this case, a) in the context of desktop reboots I'm very strongly biased toward DO IT NOW! ; b) I love torture testing file systems. > All system services present after installation with one of the > release-blocking package sets must not time out frequently or regularly when > they are being stopped during system reboot/shutdown. Alternate 1: 'must not timeout when' Alternate 2: 'must not consistently timeout when' I think blocking on transient unit timeouts may not be practical even if desirable. But there remains a problem with all of these: what if the timeout is 90s and the unit consistently takes 80s to stop? I think that's no different than 90s and systemd just killing it off. Some units have 5 minute or even indefinite timeouts set. If the criterion is hinged on the timeout being reached, then it may often not be a blocker even if that's the intent. Alternate 3: 'must not consistently hang for more than 30s when' I might get on board with 10s being the max. -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
