19/11/28 17:13(e)an, Adam Williamson igorleak idatzi zuen:
> On Thu, 2019-11-28 at 13:29 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: >> What are your thoughts? Does the proposal sound reasonable? Would you >> change something? Would you use a different backend system? Have I >> forgotten something important? Feedback welcome. > So overall I agree with a lot of what you wrote. It does cause me to > wonder if writing some kind of plugin/extension for Pagure, or just > writing the functionality into the blockerbugs app, might possibly be > *less* work than writing and maintaining the 'blocker bot', however. My > other concern would be that if we use something other than the > blockerbugs app or Bugzilla, we now have *three* different systems > involved in the blocker review process - Bugzilla, the blockerbugs app, > and the discussion system. That seems like a lot of moving parts to > keep synchronized. pagure supports third-party themes|plugins , src.fp.o uses both for custom features (anitya integration for example), we could do something similar on pagure.io, where we are already using a downstream theme but not plugin > Thanks for working on this! -- Julen Landa Alustiza
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
