Wow, yes, I did not see this. The dnf version mismatch is a biggie, I totally
agree.
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
An 9. Okt. 2019, 00:53, Adam Williamson schrieb:
> On Tue, [2019-10-08](tel:20191008) at 12:08 +0000, Rodger Etz wrote:
>> Marek looked at it and confirmed my analysis. He also stated the
>> issue will be solved.
>
> I'm not sure either of you figured it out entirely, I'm digging into it
> more ATM. But...
>
>> So IMHO there is no point discussing dep issues of certain packages,
>
> Well, there are at least several genuine issues here, one of which is
> quite bad: for some reason, there is a much newer dnf version in F30
> updates-testing [(4.2.11](tel:4211)) than there is in any F31 repo
> [(4.2.9](tel:429) is the
> latest there). F31 package 'yum' is set to obsolete F30 package 'dnf-
> yum'...but only for *older versions*, so if you have the current F30
> updates-testing dnf-yum package installed, when you try to upgrade to
> F31, nothing replaces dnf-yum. With --allowerasing, dnf will remove it
> and update dnf. Without --allowerasing, dnf will keep the old dnf in
> order to keep the old dnf-yum.
>
> That one definitely needs reporting, and I will do it.
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
