On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 2:48 PM Justin Forbes <jmfor...@linuxtx.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 2:17 PM Adam Williamson > > So...what should we do? Here are the options as I see 'em: > > > > 1. Keep supporting btrfs > > 2. Just modify the criterion with a btrfs exception, even if it's weird > > 3. Rewrite the criterion entirely > > 4. Keep btrfs support in the installer (and blivet-gui) but hide it as > > we used to - require a special boot argument for it to be visible > > 5. Drop btrfs support from the installer > > > I would opt for 4 or 5, and would be in full support of 5. I do not > think that it can (or should) be dropped from the kernel, because we > don't want to cut off existing users, and it can still be a useful > filesystem for specific cases. > Would option 5 prevent people from doing fresh installs with existing btrfs file systems from tying them in during the install process? If so, I think 4 is the better option. Thanks, Richard
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
