On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 8:46 AM Kamil Paral <kpa...@redhat.com> wrote: > > I thought about it and 7 days probably sounds OK, considering it also > includes the weekend. I think I wouldn't increase it, but consider decreasing > it if people think it's the right way to go. >
7 is definitely higher than I would have proposed. I'm not opposed to it, but I was thinking something closer to 3 days. That would make it, in practice, "if it's not up for discussion on the last regular blocker review meeting before Go/No-Go, then it doesn't count." The only bug that's really made me mad in the years On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:39 PM Kamil Paral <kpa...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Whether this new policy is a good idea, that's a separate question. The > idealist in me cries every time we sacrifice quality. And this policy will > probably result in more bugs being waved compared to the past. However, I > feel it's better to have the rules formalized than to wave such bugs without > any real grounds and feel like cheating on our policies every time we > actually need waive something. So yeah, I guess I have no objections to this > being a part of our release criteria. > I agree with all points. It's better to explicitly say "we may choose to go ahead under some circumstances" than to do rules-lawyering to find loopholes that allow us to say "no, we really did follow the criteria, this isn't a blocker because $reasons". I'm +1 to Adam's draft as-is. We can always revise it again later if experience finds flaws for us. -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
