Lukas Ruzicka <lruzi...@redhat.com> igorleak hau idatzi zuen (2019 mai. 14, ar. 10:39):
> I have suggested the quorum, but we can still discuss the exact numbers > (mine were just examples). Besides, the votes do not have to come from > people present in one particular IRC meeting, but > > - votes could be recorded in all such meetings (blocker bugs meeting, > go-nogo, ...) > - votes could be casted in Bugzilla and IRC presence does not need to > be required. > > The most important thing is, the majority agrees, not that we need to > organize voting every time we meet. > > Lukas > But we are talking about last minute blockers so potentially they'll be discussed just on one meeting (latest blocker-review or GO/No GO) and we will not have a big time window for BZ voting. I agree that the waiving should be agreed by a good majority, but I would prefer bot having any special quorum requeriments. Scenario: Go/NO-Go is running and kparal finds a last minute bug. We don't have time for BZ voting, nor we can't wait for quorum. We need to agreed a decision during the running meeting, either waiving or blocking or it. Well, I would go with standard discuss, vote & agreement process, nothing special. Otherwise we will finish just autoblocking on all last minute bockers waiting for quorum, so waiving will not be possible. >
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
