On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org > wrote:
> Hi folks! > > So at the most recent blocker review meeting, we discussed the intent > of the release criteria as regards upgrades. At present we have one > criterion, at Beta: > > "For each one of the release-blocking package sets, it must be possible > to successfully complete a direct upgrade from fully updated > installations of the last two stable Fedora releases with that package > set installed." > > Now my *intent* in writing this was that it should cover *only* out-of- > the-box installs of the release-blocking package sets; nothing beyond > out-of-the-box functionality was supposed to be covered. > > However, there seemed to be strong agreement that failure of a release- > blocking Server role to upgrade correctly should block the release. I'm not sure if you counted my response at the meeting as "agreement", but I was simply not understanding the distinction between a default install and a post-install configured server role. (I hope I understand it properly now.) > At > least in my reading (and I wrote it!) the criterion doesn't really > cover that. > > So I'm proposing changes to both make the meaning of the existing > criterion more clear, and explicitly cover the thing we agreed should > be covered. > > 1) Change the text of the existing criterion to read: > > "For each one of the release-blocking package sets, it must be possible > to successfully complete a direct upgrade from a fully updated, clean > default installation of each of the last two stable Fedora releases > with that package set installed." > Sounds reasonable. > > 2) Add a new criterion to the Beta 'Server Product requirements' > section, titled "Server upgrade requirements", text: > > "For each Featured Server Role, it must be possible to successfully > complete a direct upgrade from a fully updated installation of each of > the last two stable Fedora Server releases with that Server Role > deployed. The upgraded system must meet all relevant release criteria, > including criteria relating to functionality of the Server Role." > Should be decided by Server SIG, but the wording seems fine to me.
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
