On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 10:03:34AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > The blocker process is not a tool for the rest of the project to use as > a reminder system. It doesn't work very well for that. The expectation [...] > * QA tests Thing and finds no-one ever even started working on it > * QA files bug and marks it blocker > * Team Thing starts working on Thing > I realize that's an exaggerated example, but it's just to make the > point clear. That's not a sane development process.
Yeah; if this wasn't clear in my last message, I think that it does, unfortunately, seem to work that way by default for lack of any better/stronger schedule reminder system. I think in any case where we *do* hit something which slipped off whichever non-QA schedule, we should fix _that_ side first. Now, maybe it is also the case that the wallpaper is not really an appropriate blocker. I'm pretty sympathetic to that point on its own, too. So, I think the appropriate thing to do here is to drop this particular blocker, but add it to something else that serves as a that reminder system — ideally, with some form of teeth. Since this seems like a program management function, I'm going to talk to Jan Kurik — Fedora Program Manager — about it. -- Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
