On Mar 17, 2014, at 1:12 PM, Al Dunsmuir <al.dunsm...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> On Monday, March 17, 2014, 2:47:56 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Mar 13, 2014, at 8:50 PM, Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> What does everyone think? Thanks! >> Device tests: > >> -PATA? They aren't made anymore, do we really need to distinguish >> between SATA and PATA? Is there a case where it worked on one but >> not the other? I'd think we'd sooner want SATA vs SAS, at least they use a >> different driver. > > On ARM the majority will be MMC, with some SATA that may involve USB. > On PPC (secondary arch) SCSI is still quite important. Right so does it make sense to have these as separate categories: SATA/PATA SCSI/SAS MMC/SDCard USB PCIe SSD (which may morph into NVMe) ? I guess I'm not seeing the point of separate PATA/SATA device tests is my main point, and second is that there are other devices not in the list that maybe ought to be in the list. Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
