On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 21:11:22 -0800
Adam Williamson <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 21/02/13 01:11 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> We discussed a few possible changes to the blocker bug meeting
> >> process
> >> at the QA meeting this week. It was agreed that I'd draft up these
> >> changes for list discussion. So here they are! Sent to test@ and
> >> devel@
> >> as QA, devel and releng are the stakeholders in this process: I'm
> >> figuring releng folks are all subscribed to one list or the other.
> >>
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_SOP_blocker_bug_meeting
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_SOP_blocker_bug_process
> >>
> > As it did these moves during F18 cycle, it makes sense. Also I hope
> > F19 won't be such beast as F18 (yeah, hope :D). With automatic
> > blocker status for specific bug types, I think we are going the
> > good direction! Thanks guys!
> 
> Thanks for the feedback, Jaro and others. As per the discussion at
> the meeting on Monday, I've gone ahead and put these changes into 
> production. So everyone remember to use #fedora-blocker-review for
> the next blocker meeting :)

Does this mean we can/should retire the #fedora-bugzappers channel now?

Shall I do that?

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
test mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Reply via email to