On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Robyn Bergeron <rberg...@redhat.com> wrote: > > I am under the impression that we've been testing with/without LVM anyway, > both scenarios? In any case, it doesn't seem as earthshaking as other > developments - it's just making the default be what it's been for some time, > and given that there exists documentation for the "lvm enabled case" and not > much otherwise it seems like a reasonable thing to do. I would almost make > the case that disabling LVM by default - were it a feature - would require a > lot of that backup documentation and info that isn't really there....
Which documentation? FS directly on a partition has way more documentation then anything else ... it is what the rest of the world is using. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
