On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxw...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson > <johan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Just bringing this topic to the appropriate mailing list > > > > On the last kernel meeting [1] it was suggested negative karma points > should > > be linked to a reported bug which kinda makes sense if you think about > it. > > > > What that means is that you ( as in reporter ) will no longer be able to > > provide negative karma without linking it to an already existing bug > report > > either created by your or someone else if that came to be. > > Is there such a surplus of people testing things and providing > negative karma that it's acceptable to refuse any that doesn't come > with a bug report? And is the pain of bugless negative karma so great > that it will overcome the cost of an additional mandatory step in the > karma reporting process? > > I'm not seeing this as any additional obstacle for reporters seriously how harder is it to provide a link to a bug report vs filling in the comment field? JBG
-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
