On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 08:07 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Hey, folks. I've drafted up my proposal for adding EFI testing to the > > installation matrix here: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_Fedora_17_Install_Results_Template > > > > Compare to the current: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Fedora_17_Install_Results_Template > > > > It's fairly straightforward - it just adds an 'EFI' column to some of > > the tables, after 'i686' and 'x86_64', and adds a result box only to > > those tests it makes the most sense to repeat with EFI. I think I > > included all the tests it really makes sense to specifically do with > > EFI; the others are all variations to which it really shouldn't make > > any > > difference whether you're booting EFI or not. In total, 13 tests get > > 'EFI' boxes with the change. > > > > Please do comment if you think there's any problem with the change or > > if > > you have a better idea for how to do it! Thanks. > > > > The trac ticket here is https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/256 > > . > > -- > > Adam Williamson > > It makes the result matrix even more complex :/ But I don't have a better > idea. > > Can we make the fields where EFI is not defined grayed out? See "Key" table > at the top of the page.
Yeah, that's another way of doing it, might be more readable than just not having fields at all, as the difference between a field and no field is actually smaller than that between a white-background field and a grey-background field...I'll probably switch that, thanks. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
