Hey, folks. I'm working through the f16 QA retrospective, and one of the suggestions is:
"might need improved / more Xen test cases" I wanted to reach out particularly to those who've been involved with the Xen support and testing, but also the group in general, and see if this is correct - should we have more or improved Xen test cases to ensure the Xen support is good for F17 and future releases? What we have ATM is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Xen_Para_Virt - I note that Konrad modified this a few weeks back, and it looks better than it did previously. Is this enough, or should we enhance this test case, add more, replace it...? Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
