> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727814 > > --- Comment #8 from Tim Flink <tfl...@redhat.com> 2011-09-01 13:18:54 EDT --- > Discussed in the 2011-08-26 blocker review meeting. Rejected as a Fedora 16 > beta blocker because it doesn't violate any of the beta release criteria [1]. > > Accepted as NTH because it's annoying and a fix is ready. > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_Beta_Release_Criteria
I don't think we should mark any installer crashes as non-blockers when there is a good chance users would hit it. I believe this particular bug should have been an Alpha blocker: "The installer must be able to complete an installation using the entire disk, existing free space, or existing Linux partitions methods, with or without encryption or LVM enabled" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_Alpha_Release_Criteria Whether I do or don't provide the password to my existing encrypted partitions doesn't really matter, both ways are very probable, both ways should work. At least in my opinion. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
