On 11-07-19 09:43, James Laska wrote: > On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 06:05 -0400, Tao Wu wrote: > > Greetings folks, > > > > Just wanted to summarize how testing held up for the rawhide acceptance > > test run of Fedora 16. Thanks for your attention. It is unfortunately > > that the rawhide installation version has not passed the major test, please > > refer to the bug 723144. Let's expect the exciting coming out of next > > version! > > > > If you have spare time and want to contribute by verify this version, the > > test cases and results can be found on the following URL: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_16_Rawhide_Acceptance_Test_1#Test_Matrix > > > > Thanks a lot! > > Thanks Tao! I don't have anything to add to your results since I don't > yet have a rawhide/F16 system to test with. I'm seeing the same bug > (bug#723144) you reported on a baremetal system. Please consider > escalating this issue as a F16 Alpha release blocker since I suspect > this impacts the following Alpha release criteria [1] ... > > The installer must be able to complete an installation using the > entire disk, existing free space, or existing Linux partitions > methods, with or without encryption enabled > > If anyone is already running rawhide, there are a few post-install tests > linked on the above test matrix that could use some feedback. > Hi James,
Thanks to the comments, and I found that this bug has been escalated to a F16 release blocker. Hope it will be fixed as soon as possible. > Thanks, > James > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_Alpha_Release_Criteria > -- > test mailing list > test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
