2011/5/31 drago01 <drag...@gmail.com> > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Pasha R <pashar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Jason D. Clinton <m...@jasonclinton.com> > wrote: > >> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 05:29, Pasha R <pashar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Probably, inability to configure your screensaver is much more > >>> noticeable than inability to stop copy operation. :) > >> > >> Now *that* is intentional. > > > > Care to explain the logic behind this? Because it is really beyond my > > understanding. > > Screensavers has lost there use years ago. > With today's screens they don't really "save" anything but simply > waste power for no reason whatever. > > I never understand why anyone would want anything but "power down the > screen" in that case. What is the point of the fancy > graphics when no one is looking at it anyway? >
i, for one, really liked those screensavers, i enjoyed locking screens just to look at them.
-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
