On 01/25/2011 08:17 PM, drago01 wrote: > It is not indented as alternative to in the way you might think it is > just a fallback for older hardware and/or crappy drivers. > Hence the name "fallback".
Call it whatever you want. It is a alternative in the sense that you cannot run both at the same time. There is absolutely no technical reason why GNOME Panel would require GNOME Shell as a dependency. > If you really care that much about it > suggest a better way (no a release note entry is not it) If you are going to dismiss suggestions without any explanation, why would I bother? If you insist that a artificial dependency is the right way, then not much can be done about it. Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
