2011/1/25 Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Rahul Sundaram <methe...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On 01/25/2011 04:11 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> > >> this exact reason. Another classic example of this is updates to > >> openoffice. There have been 10 updates @ 200Mb odd MB each for oo.o > >> since the release of F-14 for such critical bugs as "background isn't > >> transparent" [1] surely these could be bundled together once a month > >> or so (I thought there was suppose to be a policy about this but I > >> can't find it). > > > > There isn't any such policy suggesting or requiring bundling of bug > > fixes and trying to mandate it via policy doesn't really seem > > feasible. We could talk to the maintainers in question and understand > > what happened first before trying to stop it. If it isn't a one off > > problem, then it makes sense to discuss it in the broader context. > > The number of updates in a stable release has been discussed, at > length. There was even discussion of implementing a policy for it but > it clearly was never done. > > another thing that can be done is somehow encouraging the creation of delta rpms, especially for big packages (like ooo).
-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
