2010/10/30 Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> > On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 14:53 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 08:41:50PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > > > 2010/10/29 Dave Jones <da...@redhat.com>: > > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 09:06:42AM +0300, cornel panceac wrote: > > > > > here > > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/ > > > > > i see a section called "Download requirements" > > > > > > > > > > shouldn't it be "Install requirements" instead? > > > > > > > > Also the '400MHz pentium pro' part reads oddly, given the > > > > fastest pentium pro was 200MHz. > > > > > > Maybe "Runs fine on Atom 230?" - in terms of speed it's like 2000/2001 > > > cpu. Sounds reasonable enough? > > > > I'd suggest just replacing with "a modern processor". It's ambiguous, but > > it doesn't encourage people to go dig out things from last century. > > I'd like to just ditch the whole section and replace it with something > vaguer. Maybe realistic minimums for the default desktop, and a note > that the requirements will vary widely depending on what you're doing > with the system. (My mailserver is currently using a princely 119MB of > RAM, and that's a perfectly valid use case for Fedora. Well, that > actually runs Mandriva, but I expect it'd be much the same on Fedora.) >
unfortunately, anaconda itself has it's own minimum requirements, which are bigger than the linux itself requirements . so i doubt anaconda will run on systems with less than 256 mb of ram . maybe that's where 384 is coming from. > > This should be filed as a request for the docs team, as they own the > relevant document. > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org > http://www.happyassassin.net > >
-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
